35% pricier ≈ $460
- Battery life (recording) 185 min vs 100 min
- Waterproof without case 15 m vs 10 m
- Depth 33 mm vs 81 mm
- 4K frame rate (max) 120 fps vs 240 fps
- Photo resolution 18 MP vs 120 MP
- Clippertoday
- Action cameras
- DJI Osmo 360
- Alternatives
Alternatives to DJI Osmo 360
10 360° cameras at a similar price that compete with the Osmo 360 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Osmo 360
6% cheaper ≈ $320
- Waterproof without case 15 m vs 10 m
- Weight 165 g vs 183 g
- Depth 37 mm vs 81 mm
- 4K frame rate (max) 60 fps vs 240 fps
- Photo resolution 29 MP vs 120 MP
88% pricier ≈ $640
- Max video bitrate 220 Mbps vs 170 Mbps
- Battery capacity 2,150 mAh vs 1,950 mAh
- Battery energy 8.3 Wh vs 7.5 Wh
100% pricier ≈ $680
- Battery life (recording) 185 min vs 100 min
- Max video bitrate 360 Mbps vs 170 Mbps
- Waterproof without case 15 m vs 10 m
- 4K frame rate (max) 120 fps vs 240 fps
- Max frame rate (slow motion) 120 fps vs 240 fps
6% cheaper ≈ $320
- Battery life (recording) 135 min vs 100 min
- Depth 37.6 mm vs 81 mm
- Battery capacity 2,290 mAh vs 1,950 mAh
- 4K frame rate (max) 100 fps vs 240 fps
- Sensor size (optical format) 0.5″ vs 0.91″
56% pricier ≈ $530
- Main screen size 3″ vs 2″
- Depth 26.6 mm vs 81 mm
- Battery capacity 2,280 mAh vs 1,950 mAh
- 4K frame rate (max) 120 fps vs 240 fps
- Weight 296 g vs 183 g
24% cheaper ≈ $260
- Battery life (recording) 150 min vs 100 min
- Weight 162 g vs 183 g
- Depth 38 mm vs 81 mm
- 4K frame rate (max) 30 fps vs 240 fps
- Waterproof without case 5 m vs 10 m
21% pricier ≈ $410
- Main screen size 3″ vs 2″
- Depth 20 mm vs 81 mm
- 4K frame rate (max) 60 fps vs 240 fps
- Sensor size (optical format) 0.5″ vs 0.91″
Same price ≈ $350
- Depth 49 mm vs 81 mm
- Microphones 6 vs 4
- Aperture f/1.8 vs f/1.9
- 4K frame rate (max) 60 fps vs 240 fps
- Sensor size (optical format) 0.44″ vs 0.91″
35% cheaper ≈ $220
- Depth 31 mm vs 81 mm
- Main screen size 2.29″ vs 2″
- Max video resolution 5.7K vs 8K
- Sensor size (optical format) 0.5″ vs 0.91″