- Clippertoday
- Compare
- AC7000 vs X35
AgfaPhoto AC7000 vs Campark X35
What AC7000 does better (0) and where X35 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is AC7000 better than X35?
AC7000 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is X35 better than AC7000?
- Battery life (recording)60 min vs 90 min+50%
- Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 240 fps2×
- Max field of view120° vs 170°+42%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 65 g | — |
| Width | 30 mm | — |
| Height | 66 mm | — |
| Depth | 30 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 240 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | — | 24 MP |
| Max field of view | 120° | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | Yes |
| Main screen size | — | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 1,050 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 60 min | 90 min |
| Removable battery | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
