LIVE240 modelsBrands 68Comparisons 867Oct 21, 2026RankingsAdvertise
clippertoday.com
  1. Clippertoday
  2. Compare
  3. AC7000 vs H3

AgfaPhoto AC7000 vs Midland H3

What AC7000 does better (2) and where H3 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

AgfaPhoto AC7000
AgfaPhoto · 2021AC7000
3.9Score
2 advantages≈ $55
vs
Midland H3
Midland · 2020H3
4.3Score
1 advantage≈ $60
Higher score
4.2Ruggedness4.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

AC7000H3
30 × 663059.3 × 29.341.1
AC7000H3Difference
Height66 mm29.3 mm+36.7 mm
Width30 mm59.3 mm−29.3 mm
Depth30 mm41.1 mm−11.1 mm
Weight65 g53 g+12 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is AC7000 better than H3?

  1. Max video resolution4K vs 1080p
  2. Depth30 mm vs 41.1 mm+37%

Why is H3 better than AC7000?

  1. Weight65 g vs 53 g+23%
Specifications

Side by side

Midland H3Midland H3≈ $604.3
Design & durability
Weight65 g53 g
Width30 mm59.3 mm
Height66 mm29.3 mm
Depth30 mm41.1 mm
Waterproof without case0 m0 m
Waterproof with housing—30 m
Video
Max video resolution4K1080p
4K frame rate (max)30 fps—
Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps—
Sensor & photo
Photo resolution—16 MP
Max field of view120°120°
Stabilisation
Electronic image stabilisation—Yes
Screens
Front screenYes—
Battery
Battery capacity—900 mAh
Battery life (recording)60 min—
Connectivity
Wi-FiYesYes
Storage & features
microSD card slotYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare