- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Realimove MC3X vs 2.0 WiFi
AgfaPhoto Realimove MC3X vs Water Wolf 2.0 WiFi
What Realimove MC3X does better (4) and where 2.0 WiFi wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.6Video2.0
3.2Photo2.8
Why is Realimove MC3X better than 2.0 WiFi?
- Max video resolution4K vs 2.5K
- Sensor size (optical format)0.4″ vs 0.33″+20%
- Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 1,000 mAh+45%
- Max field of view120° vs 116°+3%
Why is 2.0 WiFi better than Realimove MC3X?
- Aperturef/2.4 vs f/2+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 220 g | — |
| Width | 56 mm | — |
| Height | 157 mm | — |
| Depth | 45 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | — | 100 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 2.5K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 30 fps | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/3" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.4″ | 0.33″ |
| Photo resolution | 8 MP | — |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2 |
| Max field of view | 120° | 116° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 3-Achsen Stabilisation | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 3.5″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 240 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
