- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Brave 8 vs W10.1
AKASO Brave 8 vs Lamax W10.1
What Brave 8 does better (2) and where W10.1 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Brave 8W10.1
| Brave 8 | W10.1 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 36.5 mm | 42 mm | −5.5 mm |
| Width | 63 mm | 64 mm | −1 mm |
| Depth | 45 mm | 32 mm | +13 mm |
| Weight | 115 g | 127 g | −12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Brave 8 better than W10.1?
- Weight115 g vs 127 g+11%
- Battery capacity1,550 mAh vs 1,350 mAh+15%
Why is W10.1 better than Brave 8?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 240 fps4×
- Waterproof without case10 m vs 12 m+20%
- Waterproof with housing10 m vs 40 m4×
- Photo resolution48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Depth45 mm vs 32 mm+41%
- Front screen size1.22″ vs 1.4″+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 115 g | 127 g |
| Width | 63 mm | 64 mm |
| Height | 36.5 mm | 42 mm |
| Depth | 45 mm | 32 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 10 m | 12 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 10 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 240 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.5″ | — |
| Photo resolution | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Front screen size | 1.22″ | 1.4″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,550 mAh | 1,350 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 120 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | — | 256 GB |
| Voice control | Yes | — |
