- Clippertoday
- Compare
- EK7000 Pro vs SJ11 Active
AKASO EK7000 Pro vs SJCAM SJ11 Active
What EK7000 Pro does better (2) and where SJ11 Active wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.7Video6.4
6.6Photo4.8
4.2Ruggedness9.6
Why is EK7000 Pro better than SJ11 Active?
- Photo resolution16 MP vs 12 MP+33%
- Max field of view170° vs 154°+10%
Why is SJ11 Active better than EK7000 Pro?
- 4K frame rate (max)25 fps vs 60 fps2.4×
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 30 m
- Battery capacity1,050 mAh vs 1,300 mAh+24%
- Main screen size2″ vs 2.33″+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Width | — | 64.5 mm |
| Height | — | 44.5 mm |
| Depth | — | 30.5 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 30 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 25 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 16 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2.3 |
| Max field of view | 170° | 154° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | Gyroskopischer Bildstabilisator |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2.33″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | 1,300 mAh |
| Battery energy | — | 4.9 Wh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 140 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Live streaming | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
