LIVE240 modelsBrands 68Comparisons 865Oct 21, 2026RankingsAdvertise
clippertoday.com
  1. Clippertoday
  2. Compare
  3. EK7000 Pro vs SJ4000 Dual Screen

AKASO EK7000 Pro vs SJCAM SJ4000 Dual Screen

What EK7000 Pro does better (2) and where SJ4000 Dual Screen wins (2) — every spec side by side.

AKASO EK7000 Pro
AKASO · 2022EK7000 Pro
5.0Score
2 advantages≈ $95
vs
SJCAM SJ4000 Dual Screen
SJCAM · 2023SJ4000 Dual Screen
5.8Score
2 advantages≈ $45
Higher score
2.7Video4.9
6.6Photo6.6
4.2Ruggedness4.2

Why is EK7000 Pro better than SJ4000 Dual Screen?

  1. Battery capacity1,050 mAh vs 900 mAh+17%
  2. Waterproof with housing40 m vs 30 m+33%

Why is SJ4000 Dual Screen better than EK7000 Pro?

  1. Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 120 fps2×
  2. 4K frame rate (max)25 fps vs 30 fps+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Design & durability
Width—29.8 mm
Height—59.2 mm
Depth—41 mm
Waterproof without case0 m0 m
Waterproof with housing40 m30 m
Video
Max video resolution4K4K
4K frame rate (max)25 fps30 fps
Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps120 fps
H.265 / HEVC—Yes
Timelapse / hyperlapseYesYes
Sensor & photo
Photo resolution16 MP16 MP
Max field of view170°170°
Stabilisation
Stabilisation systemElektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS)—
Electronic image stabilisationYes—
Screens
Front screen—Yes
Main screen size2″—
TouchscreenYesYes
Audio
External microphone support—Yes
Battery
Battery capacity1,050 mAh900 mAh
Connectivity
Wi-FiYesYes
Webcam mode—Yes
Storage & features
microSD card slotYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare