- Clippertoday
- Compare
- EK7000 vs AT-Q1 4K Ultra HD
AKASO EK7000 vs Lipa AT-Q1 4K Ultra HD
What EK7000 does better (1) and where AT-Q1 4K Ultra HD wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.7Video8.0
4.2Ruggedness4.2
Why is EK7000 better than AT-Q1 4K Ultra HD?
- Battery capacity1,050 mAh vs 900 mAh+17%
Why is AT-Q1 4K Ultra HD better than EK7000?
- 4K frame rate (max)25 fps vs 60 fps2.4×
- Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 240 fps4×
- Photo resolution20 MP vs 24 MP+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 100 g |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 25 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 240 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 20 MP | 24 MP |
| Aperture | f/2 | — |
| Max field of view | 170° | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Electronic (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | 900 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 90 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
