LIVE240 modelsBrands 68Comparisons 867Oct 21, 2026RankingsAdvertise
clippertoday.com
  1. Clippertoday
  2. Compare
  3. EK7000 vs SL3 4K

AKASO EK7000 vs Patona SL3 4K

What EK7000 does better (4) and where SL3 4K wins (4) — every spec side by side.

AKASO EK7000
AKASO · 2024EK7000
5.5Score
4 advantages≈ $60
vs
Patona SL3 4K
Patona · 2025SL3 4K
7.8Score
4 advantages≈ $80
Higher score
2.7Video7.3
9.0Photo4.3
4.2Ruggedness9.6
4.8Battery4.2

Why is EK7000 better than SL3 4K?

  1. Photo resolution20 MP vs 16 MP+25%
  2. Battery capacity1,050 mAh vs 1,000 mAh+5%
  3. Aperturef/2 vs f/2.8+40%
  4. Max field of view170° vs 140°+21%

Why is SL3 4K better than EK7000?

  1. 4K frame rate (max)25 fps vs 60 fps2.4×
  2. Waterproof without case0 m vs 30 m
  3. Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 120 fps2×
  4. Main screen size2″ vs 3″+50%
Specifications

Side by side

AKASO EK7000AKASO EK7000≈ $605.5
Patona SL3 4KPatona SL3 4K≈ $807.8
Design & durability
Waterproof without case0 m30 m
Waterproof with housing30 m—
Video
Max video resolution4K4K
4K frame rate (max)25 fps60 fps
Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps120 fps
H.265 / HEVC—Yes
Timelapse / hyperlapseYesYes
Sensor & photo
Photo resolution20 MP16 MP
Aperturef/2f/2.8
Max field of view170°140°
Stabilisation
Stabilisation systemElectronic (EIS)—
Electronic image stabilisationYes—
Screens
Main screen size2″3″
Audio
External microphone supportYes—
Battery
Battery capacity1,050 mAh1,000 mAh
Battery life (recording)90 min90 min
Connectivity
Wi-FiYesYes
Storage & features
microSD card slotYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare