LIVE240 modelsBrands 68Comparisons 865Oct 21, 2026RankingsAdvertise
clippertoday.com
  1. Clippertoday
  2. Compare
  3. EK7000 vs SJ11 Active

AKASO EK7000 vs SJCAM SJ11 Active

What EK7000 does better (3) and where SJ11 Active wins (5) — every spec side by side.

AKASO EK7000
AKASO · 2024EK7000
5.5Score
3 advantages≈ $60
vs
SJCAM SJ11 Active
SJCAM · 2023SJ11 Active
8.8Score
5 advantages≈ $95
Higher score
2.7Video6.4
9.0Photo4.8
4.2Ruggedness9.6
4.8Battery8.2

Why is EK7000 better than SJ11 Active?

  1. Photo resolution20 MP vs 12 MP+67%
  2. Aperturef/2 vs f/2.3+15%
  3. Max field of view170° vs 154°+10%

Why is SJ11 Active better than EK7000?

  1. 4K frame rate (max)25 fps vs 60 fps2.4×
  2. Waterproof without case0 m vs 30 m
  3. Battery life (recording)90 min vs 140 min+56%
  4. Battery capacity1,050 mAh vs 1,300 mAh+24%
  5. Main screen size2″ vs 2.33″+17%
Specifications

Side by side

AKASO EK7000AKASO EK7000≈ $605.5
Design & durability
Width—64.5 mm
Height—44.5 mm
Depth—30.5 mm
Waterproof without case0 m30 m
Waterproof with housing30 m—
Video
Max video resolution4K4K
4K frame rate (max)25 fps60 fps
Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps60 fps
H.265 / HEVC—Yes
Timelapse / hyperlapseYes—
Sensor & photo
Photo resolution20 MP12 MP
Aperturef/2f/2.3
Max field of view170°154°
Stabilisation
Stabilisation systemElectronic (EIS)Gyroskopischer Bildstabilisator
Electronic image stabilisationYesYes
Screens
Front screen—Yes
Main screen size2″2.33″
Touchscreen—Yes
Audio
External microphone supportYes—
Battery
Battery capacity1,050 mAh1,300 mAh
Battery energy—4.9 Wh
Battery life (recording)90 min140 min
Connectivity
Wi-FiYesYes
Webcam mode—Yes
Live streaming—Yes
Storage & features
microSD card slotYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare