LIVE240 modelsBrands 68Comparisons 865Oct 21, 2026RankingsAdvertise
clippertoday.com
  1. Clippertoday
  2. Compare
  3. EK7000 vs SJ4000 Dual Screen

AKASO EK7000 vs SJCAM SJ4000 Dual Screen

What EK7000 does better (2) and where SJ4000 Dual Screen wins (2) — every spec side by side.

AKASO EK7000
AKASO · 2024EK7000
5.5Score
2 advantages≈ $60
vs
SJCAM SJ4000 Dual Screen
SJCAM · 2023SJ4000 Dual Screen
5.8Score
2 advantages≈ $45
Higher score
2.7Video4.9
9.0Photo6.6
4.2Ruggedness4.2

Why is EK7000 better than SJ4000 Dual Screen?

  1. Photo resolution20 MP vs 16 MP+25%
  2. Battery capacity1,050 mAh vs 900 mAh+17%

Why is SJ4000 Dual Screen better than EK7000?

  1. Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 120 fps2×
  2. 4K frame rate (max)25 fps vs 30 fps+20%
Specifications

Side by side

AKASO EK7000AKASO EK7000≈ $605.5
Design & durability
Width—29.8 mm
Height—59.2 mm
Depth—41 mm
Waterproof without case0 m0 m
Waterproof with housing30 m30 m
Video
Max video resolution4K4K
4K frame rate (max)25 fps30 fps
Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps120 fps
H.265 / HEVC—Yes
Timelapse / hyperlapseYesYes
Sensor & photo
Photo resolution20 MP16 MP
Aperturef/2—
Max field of view170°170°
Stabilisation
Stabilisation systemElectronic (EIS)—
Electronic image stabilisationYes—
Screens
Front screen—Yes
Main screen size2″—
Touchscreen—Yes
Audio
External microphone supportYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity1,050 mAh900 mAh
Battery life (recording)90 min—
Connectivity
Wi-FiYesYes
Webcam mode—Yes
Storage & features
microSD card slotYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare