- Clippertoday
- Compare
- EK7000 vs GO 2600
AKASO EK7000 vs Trevi GO 2600
What EK7000 does better (1) and where GO 2600 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is EK7000 better than GO 2600?
- Max field of view170° vs 140°+21%
Why is GO 2600 better than EK7000?
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 21 m
- Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 120 fps2×
- 4K frame rate (max)25 fps vs 30 fps+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 21 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 25 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 20 MP | 20 MP |
| Aperture | f/2 | — |
| Max field of view | 170° | 140° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Electronic (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 90 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
