- Clippertoday
- Compare
- V50 X Cube vs W9.2
AKASO V50 X Cube vs Lamax W9.2
What V50 X Cube does better (3) and where W9.2 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.1Video6.4
7.6Ruggedness8.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
V50 X CubeW9.2
| V50 X Cube | W9.2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 45 mm | 42 mm | +3 mm |
| Width | 53.7 mm | 64 mm | −10.3 mm |
| Depth | 37.9 mm | 32 mm | +5.9 mm |
| Weight | 100 g | 127 g | −27 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V50 X Cube better than W9.2?
- Waterproof without case21 m vs 12 m+75%
- Weight100 g vs 127 g+27%
- Main screen size2.1″ vs 2″+5%
Why is W9.2 better than V50 X Cube?
- 4K frame rate (max)30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Max frame rate (slow motion)30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Battery capacity1,050 mAh vs 1,350 mAh+29%
- Depth37.9 mm vs 32 mm+18%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 100 g | 127 g |
| Width | 53.7 mm | 64 mm |
| Height | 45 mm | 42 mm |
| Depth | 37.9 mm | 32 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 21 m | 12 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 40 m |
| Min operating temperature | -5 °C | — |
| Max operating temperature | 45 °C | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 20 MP | 20 MP |
| Max field of view | — | 120° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2.1″ | 2″ |
| Front screen size | — | 1.4″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | 1,350 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 120 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | — | 128 GB |
| Timecode sync | Yes | — |
