- Clippertoday
- Compare
- V50 X Cube vs AT-M82TR 6K
AKASO V50 X Cube vs Lipa AT-M82TR 6K
What V50 X Cube does better (2) and where AT-M82TR 6K wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.1Video8.9
7.6Ruggedness4.2
Why is V50 X Cube better than AT-M82TR 6K?
- Weight100 g vs 300 g3×
- Waterproof without case21 m vs 0 m
Why is AT-M82TR 6K better than V50 X Cube?
- Max video resolution4K vs 6K
- 4K frame rate (max)30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Max frame rate (slow motion)30 fps vs 120 fps4×
- Photo resolution20 MP vs 50 MP2.5×
- Battery capacity1,050 mAh vs 1,350 mAh+29%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 100 g | 300 g |
| Width | 53.7 mm | — |
| Height | 45 mm | — |
| Depth | 37.9 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | 21 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 30 m |
| Min operating temperature | -5 °C | — |
| Max operating temperature | 45 °C | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 6K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 30 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 20 MP | 50 MP |
| Max field of view | — | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2.1″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | 1,350 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 90 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Timecode sync | Yes | — |
