- Clippertoday
- Compare
- V50 X vs 2.0 WiFi
AKASO V50 X vs Water Wolf 2.0 WiFi
What V50 X does better (3) and where 2.0 WiFi wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is V50 X better than 2.0 WiFi?
- Max video resolution4K vs 2.5K
- Battery capacity1,350 mAh vs 1,000 mAh+35%
- Max field of view170° vs 116°+47%
Why is 2.0 WiFi better than V50 X?
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 100 m
- Battery life (recording)180 min vs 240 min+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 100 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 2.5K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 30 fps | — |
| HDR video | Yes | — |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/3" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.33″ |
| Photo resolution | 20 MP | — |
| Aperture | — | f/2 |
| Max field of view | 170° | 116° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,350 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 180 min | 240 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
