- Clippertoday
- Compare
- M90 Pro vs GO 2600
Apexcam M90 Pro vs Trevi GO 2600
What M90 Pro does better (1) and where GO 2600 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is M90 Pro better than GO 2600?
- Max field of view170° vs 140°+21%
Why is GO 2600 better than M90 Pro?
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 21 m
- Max frame rate (slow motion)30 fps vs 120 fps4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 21 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 30 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 20 MP | 20 MP |
| Max field of view | 170° | 140° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | — | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,200 mAh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 240 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
