- Clippertoday
- Compare
- X60Pro vs X3.2
Apexcam X60Pro vs Lamax X3.2
What X60Pro does better (4) and where X3.2 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is X60Pro better than X3.2?
- Max video resolution4K vs 2.7K
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Photo resolution20 MP vs 12 MP+67%
- Battery capacity1,350 mAh vs 1,200 mAh+12%
Why is X3.2 better than X60Pro?
X3.2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 65 g |
| Width | — | 60 mm |
| Height | — | 44 mm |
| Depth | — | 33 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | — |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 2.7K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 20 MP | 12 MP |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 6-Achsen Stabilisation | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | — | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,350 mAh | 1,200 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 135 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | — | Yes |
| Max memory card | — | 128 GB |
