- Clippertoday
- Compare
- XS600PRO vs X7.2
Billow XS600PRO vs Lamax X7.2
What XS600PRO does better (1) and where X7.2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
XS600PROX7.2
| XS600PRO | X7.2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 41 mm | 44 mm | −3 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 60 mm | −1 mm |
| Depth | 24 mm | 33 mm | −9 mm |
| Weight | 66 g | 65 g | +1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is XS600PRO better than X7.2?
- Depth24 mm vs 33 mm+38%
Why is X7.2 better than XS600PRO?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)30 fps vs 120 fps4×
- Waterproof with housing30 m vs 40 m+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 66 g | 65 g |
| Width | 59 mm | 60 mm |
| Height | 41 mm | 44 mm |
| Depth | 24 mm | 33 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 30 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| Max field of view | 170° | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | 1,050 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 120 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | — | Yes |
| Max memory card | — | 128 GB |
