- Clippertoday
- Compare
- TLC130 vs S1c
Brinno TLC130 vs EZVIZ S1c
What TLC130 does better (3) and where S1c wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TLC130S1c
| TLC130 | S1c | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 55 mm | 58 mm | −3 mm |
| Width | 55 mm | 20.6 mm | +34.4 mm |
| Depth | 28.2 mm | 45 mm | −16.8 mm |
| Weight | 75 g | 100 g | −25 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TLC130 better than S1c?
- Weight75 g vs 100 g+33%
- Sensor size (optical format)0.37″ vs 0.33″+11%
- Depth28.2 mm vs 45 mm+60%
Why is S1c better than TLC130?
- Photo resolution2 MP vs 8 MP3.8×
- Min operating temperature0 °C vs -20 °C
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 75 g | 100 g |
| Width | 55 mm | 20.6 mm |
| Height | 55 mm | 58 mm |
| Depth | 28.2 mm | 45 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 40 m |
| Ingress protection | — | IP66 |
| Min operating temperature | 0 °C | -20 °C |
| Max operating temperature | 45 °C | 45 °C |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 1080p | 1080p |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | — | 50 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2.7" | 1/3" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.37″ | 0.33″ |
| Photo resolution | 2 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2 | — |
| Max field of view | 138° | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | — | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,350 mAh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 120 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
