- Clippertoday
- Compare
- TLC130 vs Black Hawk+ 4K
Brinno TLC130 vs GoXtreme Black Hawk+ 4K
What TLC130 does better (3) and where Black Hawk+ 4K wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.2Video8.8
3.1Photo7.2
2.0Ruggedness4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
TLC130Black Hawk+ 4K
| TLC130 | Black Hawk+ 4K | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 55 mm | 42 mm | +13 mm |
| Width | 55 mm | 61 mm | −6 mm |
| Depth | 28.2 mm | 23 mm | +5.2 mm |
| Weight | 75 g | 78 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TLC130 better than Black Hawk+ 4K?
- Weight75 g vs 78 g+5%
- Battery capacity1,350 mAh vs 1,050 mAh+29%
- Aperturef/2 vs f/2.8+40%
Why is Black Hawk+ 4K better than TLC130?
- Sensor size (optical format)0.37″ vs 1″2.7×
- Max video resolution1080p vs 4K
- Photo resolution2 MP vs 12 MP5.7×
- Max field of view138° vs 170°+23%
- Depth28.2 mm vs 23 mm+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 75 g | 78 g |
| Width | 55 mm | 61 mm |
| Height | 55 mm | 42 mm |
| Depth | 28.2 mm | 23 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 60 m |
| Min operating temperature | 0 °C | — |
| Max operating temperature | 45 °C | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | — | 240 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2.7" | 1" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.37″ | 1″ |
| Photo resolution | 2 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2 | f/2.8 |
| Max field of view | 138° | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | — | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,350 mAh | 1,050 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
