- Clippertoday
- Compare
- TLC130 vs X9.1
Brinno TLC130 vs Lamax X9.1
What TLC130 does better (2) and where X9.1 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TLC130X9.1
| TLC130 | X9.1 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 55 mm | 44 mm | +11 mm |
| Width | 55 mm | 60 mm | −5 mm |
| Depth | 28.2 mm | 33 mm | −4.8 mm |
| Weight | 75 g | 72 g | +3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TLC130 better than X9.1?
- Battery capacity1,350 mAh vs 1,050 mAh+29%
- Depth28.2 mm vs 33 mm+17%
Why is X9.1 better than TLC130?
- Max video resolution1080p vs 4K
- Photo resolution2 MP vs 12 MP5.7×
- Weight75 g vs 72 g+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 75 g | 72 g |
| Width | 55 mm | 60 mm |
| Height | 55 mm | 44 mm |
| Depth | 28.2 mm | 33 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 40 m |
| Min operating temperature | 0 °C | — |
| Max operating temperature | 45 °C | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | — | 120 fps |
| HDR video | — | Yes |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2.7" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.37″ | — |
| Photo resolution | 2 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2 | — |
| Max field of view | 138° | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | Optischer Bildstabilisator (OIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | — | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,350 mAh | 1,050 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 90 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
