- Clippertoday
- Compare
- ACT74A vs H3
Campark ACT74A vs Midland H3
What ACT74A does better (5) and where H3 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is ACT74A better than H3?
- Max video resolution4K vs 1080p
- Photo resolution20 MP vs 16 MP+25%
- Battery capacity1,050 mAh vs 900 mAh+17%
- Max field of view170° vs 120°+42%
- Waterproof with housing40 m vs 30 m+33%
Why is H3 better than ACT74A?
H3 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 53 g |
| Width | — | 59.3 mm |
| Height | — | 29.3 mm |
| Depth | — | 41.1 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 20 MP | 16 MP |
| Max field of view | 170° | 120° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | 900 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 90 min | — |
| Removable battery | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | 64 GB | — |
