- Clippertoday
- Compare
- X35 vs GA300
Campark X35 vs WOLFANG GA300
What X35 does better (2) and where GA300 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is X35 better than GA300?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 60 fps4×
- Photo resolution24 MP vs 20 MP+20%
Why is GA300 better than X35?
- 4K frame rate (max)30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Battery capacity1,050 mAh vs 1,350 mAh+29%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 60 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 24 MP | 20 MP |
| Max field of view | 170° | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | 6-Achsen Stabilisation |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | 1,350 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 90 min | — |
| Removable battery | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
