- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Xiaomi WiFi vs X5.2
DAM Xiaomi WiFi vs Lamax X5.2
What Xiaomi WiFi does better (1) and where X5.2 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
2.4Photo2.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Xiaomi WiFiX5.2
| Xiaomi WiFi | X5.2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 29 mm | 44 mm | −15 mm |
| Width | 60 mm | 60 mm | = |
| Depth | 42 mm | 33 mm | +9 mm |
| Weight | 70 g | 65 g | +5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Xiaomi WiFi better than X5.2?
- Max field of view155° vs 120°+29%
Why is X5.2 better than Xiaomi WiFi?
- Max video resolution1080p vs 4K
- Photo resolution5 MP vs 12 MP2.4×
- Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Weight70 g vs 65 g+8%
- Depth42 mm vs 33 mm+27%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 70 g | 65 g |
| Width | 60 mm | 60 mm |
| Height | 29 mm | 44 mm |
| Depth | 42 mm | 33 mm |
| Waterproof without case | — | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 5 MP | 12 MP |
| Max field of view | 155° | 120° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | HyperSmooth |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | — | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 1,200 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 135 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | — | Yes |
| Max memory card | — | 128 GB |
