- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Osmo 360 vs GO 2600
DJI Osmo 360 vs Trevi GO 2600
What Osmo 360 does better (5) and where GO 2600 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is Osmo 360 better than GO 2600?
- 4K frame rate (max)240 fps vs 30 fps8×
- Max video resolution8K vs 4K
- Photo resolution120 MP vs 20 MP6×
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Max field of view360° vs 140°2.6×
Why is GO 2600 better than Osmo 360?
- Waterproof without case10 m vs 21 m2.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 183 g | — |
| Width | 61 mm | — |
| Height | 36.3 mm | — |
| Depth | 81 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | 10 m | 21 m |
| Min operating temperature | -20 °C | — |
| Max operating temperature | 45 °C | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 8K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 240 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 120 fps |
| Max video bitrate | 170 Mbps | — |
| Log colour profile | Yes | — |
| HDR video | Yes | — |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Pre-recording (HindSight / Pre-Rec) | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/1.1" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.91″ | — |
| Photo resolution | 120 MP | 20 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | — |
| Max field of view | 360° | 140° |
| Lenses | 2 | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | RockSteady 3.0, HorizonSteady | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| 360° horizon lock | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Audio | ||
| Microphones | 4 | — |
| External microphone support | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,950 mAh | — |
| Battery energy | 7.5 Wh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 100 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Live streaming | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| Internal storage | 128 GB | — |
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
| Max memory card | 1,024 GB | — |
| Voice control | Yes | — |
