- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Osmo Pocket vs Pocket
DJI Osmo Pocket vs PnJ Pocket
What Osmo Pocket does better (4) and where Pocket wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.7Video2.6
4.0Photo2.6
4.2Battery5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Osmo PocketPocket
| Osmo Pocket | Difference | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 36.9 mm | 38 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Width | 121.9 mm | 129.5 mm | −7.6 mm |
| Depth | 28.6 mm | 41.5 mm | −12.9 mm |
| Weight | 116 g | 134 g | −18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Osmo Pocket better than Pocket?
- 4K frame rate (max)60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 30 fps4×
- Weight116 g vs 134 g+16%
- Depth28.6 mm vs 41.5 mm+45%
Why is Pocket better than Osmo Pocket?
- Battery capacity875 mAh vs 1,600 mAh+83%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 116 g | 134 g |
| Width | 121.9 mm | 129.5 mm |
| Height | 36.9 mm | 38 mm |
| Depth | 28.6 mm | 41.5 mm |
| Min operating temperature | 0 °C | — |
| Max operating temperature | 40 °C | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 30 fps |
| Max video bitrate | 100 Mbps | — |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.44″ | — |
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/3 |
| Max field of view | 80° | — |
| RAW photos | Yes | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | 3-Achsen Stabilisation |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Mechanical gimbal | 3 axes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 1″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 875 mAh | 1,600 mAh |
| Battery energy | 6.7 Wh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 140 min | 140 min |
| Charging time | 73 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
