- Clippertoday
- Compare
- VIRB Ultra 30 vs X3.2
Garmin VIRB Ultra 30 vs Lamax X3.2
What VIRB Ultra 30 does better (4) and where X3.2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
7.8Battery7.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
VIRB Ultra 30X3.2
| VIRB Ultra 30 | X3.2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 45.9 mm | 44 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Width | 57.5 mm | 60 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Depth | 31.3 mm | 33 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Weight | 88 g | 65 g | +23 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is VIRB Ultra 30 better than X3.2?
- Max video resolution4K vs 2.7K
- Max frame rate (slow motion)300 fps vs 120 fps2.5×
- Battery capacity1,250 mAh vs 1,200 mAh+4%
- Depth31.3 mm vs 33 mm+5%
Why is X3.2 better than VIRB Ultra 30?
- Weight88 g vs 65 g+35%
- Main screen size1.75″ vs 2″+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 88 g | 65 g |
| Width | 57.5 mm | 60 mm |
| Height | 45.9 mm | 44 mm |
| Depth | 31.3 mm | 33 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | — |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 2.7K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 300 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Digitale Bildstabilisierung (DIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 1.75″ | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,250 mAh | 1,200 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 135 min | 135 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| GPS | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | — | 128 GB |
| Voice control | Yes | — |
