- Clippertoday
- Compare
- HERO 2024 vs W9.2
GoPro HERO 2024 vs Lamax W9.2
What HERO 2024 does better (2) and where W9.2 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
HERO 2024W9.2
| HERO 2024 | W9.2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 47.7 mm | 42 mm | +5.7 mm |
| Width | 56.6 mm | 64 mm | −7.4 mm |
| Depth | 29.4 mm | 32 mm | −2.6 mm |
| Weight | 86 g | 127 g | −41 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is HERO 2024 better than W9.2?
- Weight86 g vs 127 g+48%
- Depth29.4 mm vs 32 mm+9%
Why is W9.2 better than HERO 2024?
- Waterproof without case5 m vs 12 m2.4×
- 4K frame rate (max)30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Photo resolution12 MP vs 20 MP+67%
- Main screen size1.76″ vs 2″+14%
- Battery capacity1,225 mAh vs 1,350 mAh+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 86 g | 127 g |
| Width | 56.6 mm | 64 mm |
| Height | 47.7 mm | 42 mm |
| Depth | 29.4 mm | 32 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 5 m | 12 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 40 m |
| Min operating temperature | -10 °C | — |
| Max operating temperature | 35 °C | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | 20 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | — |
| Max field of view | — | 120° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | HyperSmooth | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | 1.76″ | 2″ |
| Front screen size | — | 1.4″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,225 mAh | 1,350 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 120 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | — | 128 GB |
| Voice control | Yes | — |
