- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Black Hawk+ 4K vs Muvi KX-1
GoXtreme Black Hawk+ 4K vs Veho Muvi KX-1
What Black Hawk+ 4K does better (6) and where Muvi KX-1 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Video4.0
7.2Photo3.8
4.2Ruggedness4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Black Hawk+ 4KMuvi KX-1
| Black Hawk+ 4K | Muvi KX-1 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 42 mm | 40 mm | +2 mm |
| Width | 61 mm | 52 mm | +9 mm |
| Depth | 23 mm | 26 mm | −3 mm |
| Weight | 78 g | 67 g | +12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Black Hawk+ 4K better than Muvi KX-1?
- 4K frame rate (max)60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 60 fps4×
- Main screen size2″ vs 1.8″+11%
- Waterproof with housing60 m vs 40 m+50%
- Max field of view170° vs 140°+21%
- Depth23 mm vs 26 mm+13%
Why is Muvi KX-1 better than Black Hawk+ 4K?
- Weight78 g vs 67 g+17%
- Aperturef/2.8 vs f/2.5+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 78 g | 67 g |
| Width | 61 mm | 52 mm |
| Height | 42 mm | 40 mm |
| Depth | 23 mm | 26 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 60 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 60 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 1″ | — |
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.5 |
| Max field of view | 170° | 140° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 1.8″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | 1,050 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | — | Yes |
