- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Vision vs X9.1
GoXtreme Vision vs Lamax X9.1
What Vision does better (1) and where X9.1 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
VisionX9.1
| Vision | X9.1 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 30 mm | 44 mm | −14 mm |
| Width | 60 mm | 60 mm | = |
| Depth | 41 mm | 33 mm | +8 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Vision better than X9.1?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 120 fps2×
Why is X9.1 better than Vision?
- Waterproof with housing30 m vs 40 m+33%
- Depth41 mm vs 33 mm+24%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 72 g |
| Width | 60 mm | 60 mm |
| Height | 30 mm | 44 mm |
| Depth | 41 mm | 33 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 120 fps |
| HDR video | — | Yes |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Max field of view | 170° | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | Optischer Bildstabilisator (OIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | 1,050 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 90 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
