- Clippertoday
- Compare
- XCAM720HD vs XMIC
Hamlet XCAM720HD vs Nilox XMIC
What XCAM720HD does better (1) and where XMIC wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
XCAM720HDXMIC
| XCAM720HD | XMIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 30 mm | 59 mm | −29 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 30 mm | +29 mm |
| Depth | 41 mm | 41 mm | = |
| Weight | 55 g | 56 g | −1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is XCAM720HD better than XMIC?
- Weight55 g vs 56 g+2%
Why is XMIC better than XCAM720HD?
- Max video resolution1080p vs 5K
- Max frame rate (slow motion)30 fps vs 60 fps2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 55 g | 56 g |
| Width | 59 mm | 30 mm |
| Height | 30 mm | 59 mm |
| Depth | 41 mm | 41 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 1080p | 5K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | — | 8 MP |
| Max field of view | 110° | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | 900 mAh |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
