- Clippertoday
- Compare
- XCAM720HD vs AC4K 120
Hamlet XCAM720HD vs Renkforce AC4K 120
What XCAM720HD does better (2) and where AC4K 120 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
XCAM720HDAC4K 120
| XCAM720HD | AC4K 120 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 30 mm | 41 mm | −11 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 59 mm | = |
| Depth | 41 mm | 24.5 mm | +16.5 mm |
| Weight | 55 g | 64 g | −9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is XCAM720HD better than AC4K 120?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)30 fps vs 10 fps3×
- Weight55 g vs 64 g+16%
Why is AC4K 120 better than XCAM720HD?
- Max video resolution1080p vs 4K
- Depth41 mm vs 24.5 mm+67%
- Max field of view110° vs 140°+27%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 55 g | 64 g |
| Width | 59 mm | 59 mm |
| Height | 30 mm | 41 mm |
| Depth | 41 mm | 24.5 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 30 m |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 10 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 30 fps | 10 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | — | 2 MP |
| Max field of view | 110° | 140° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | 900 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 180 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
