- Clippertoday
- Compare
- DV100 vs X3.2
Hoco DV100 vs Lamax X3.2
What DV100 does better (1) and where X3.2 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is DV100 better than X3.2?
- Weight50 g vs 65 g+30%
Why is X3.2 better than DV100?
- Max video resolution1080p vs 2.7K
- Max frame rate (slow motion)30 fps vs 120 fps4×
- Battery capacity900 mAh vs 1,200 mAh+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 50 g | 65 g |
| Width | — | 60 mm |
| Height | — | 44 mm |
| Depth | — | 33 mm |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 1080p | 2.7K |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 30 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | — | 12 MP |
| Max field of view | 150° | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | 1,200 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 135 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | — | 128 GB |
