- Clippertoday
- Compare
- A-1 vs AT-M40R
IceFox A-1 vs Lipa AT-M40R
What A-1 does better (1) and where AT-M40R wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is A-1 better than AT-M40R?
- Waterproof with housing40 m vs 30 m+33%
Why is AT-M40R better than A-1?
- Max video resolution4K vs 5K
- Photo resolution20 MP vs 24 MP+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | 30 m |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 5K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 240 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 20 MP | 24 MP |
| Max field of view | 170° | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | Yes |
| Main screen size | — | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,350 mAh | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
