- Clippertoday
- Compare
- A-1 vs SL3 4K
IceFox A-1 vs Patona SL3 4K
What A-1 does better (4) and where SL3 4K wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is A-1 better than SL3 4K?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Battery capacity1,350 mAh vs 1,000 mAh+35%
- Photo resolution20 MP vs 16 MP+25%
- Max field of view170° vs 140°+21%
Why is SL3 4K better than A-1?
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 30 m
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 30 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 120 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 20 MP | 16 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2.8 |
| Max field of view | 170° | 140° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | — | 3″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,350 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 90 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
