- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Ace Pro vs 2.0 WiFi
Insta360 Ace Pro vs Water Wolf 2.0 WiFi
What Ace Pro does better (3) and where 2.0 WiFi wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is Ace Pro better than 2.0 WiFi?
- Sensor size (optical format)0.77″ vs 0.33″2.3×
- Max video resolution8K vs 2.5K
- Battery capacity1,650 mAh vs 1,000 mAh+65%
Why is 2.0 WiFi better than Ace Pro?
- Waterproof without case10 m vs 100 m10×
- Battery life (recording)100 min vs 240 min2.4×
- Aperturef/2.6 vs f/2+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 180 g | — |
| Width | 71.9 mm | — |
| Height | 52.2 mm | — |
| Depth | 38.5 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | 10 m | 100 m |
| Min operating temperature | -20 °C | — |
| Max operating temperature | 40 °C | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 8K | 2.5K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 120 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | — |
| HDR video | Yes | — |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/1.3" | 1/3" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.77″ | 0.33″ |
| Photo resolution | 48 MP | — |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2 |
| Max field of view | — | 116° |
| RAW photos | Yes | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 6-Achsen Stabilisation | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2.4″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Audio | ||
| Microphones | 3 | — |
| External microphone support | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,650 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 100 min | 240 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| GPS | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Voice control | Yes | — |
