- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Pro 2.0 vs X6
Insta360 Pro 2.0 vs Insta360 X6
What Pro 2.0 does better (2) and where X6 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is Pro 2.0 better than X6?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 2,400 mAh2.1×
- Max field of view360° vs 170°2.1×
Why is X6 better than Pro 2.0?
- Weight1,550 g vs 180 g8.6×
- Photo resolution60 MP vs 120 MP2×
- Aperturef/2.4 vs f/2+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 1,550 g | 180 g |
| Width | — | 10 mm |
| Height | — | 33 mm |
| Depth | — | 33 mm |
| Waterproof without case | — | 15 m |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Min operating temperature | — | -20 °C |
| Max operating temperature | — | 40 °C |
| Magnetic quick-release mount | — | Yes |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 8K | 8K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| Max video bitrate | — | 360 Mbps |
| Log colour profile | — | Yes |
| HDR video | Yes | Yes |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Pre-recording (HindSight / Pre-Rec) | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 1″ |
| Photo resolution | 60 MP | 120 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2 |
| Max field of view | 360° | 170° |
| Lenses | — | 2 |
| RAW photos | Yes | Yes |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | 6-Achsen Stabilisation |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | — | 2.29″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 2,400 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 185 min |
| Charging time | — | 24 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| GPS | Yes | — |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| Internal storage | — | 47 GB |
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | — | 1,024 GB |
| Voice control | — | Yes |
