- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Pro 2.0 vs QooCam 3 Ultra
Insta360 Pro 2.0 vs Kandao QooCam 3 Ultra
What Pro 2.0 does better (2) and where QooCam 3 Ultra wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.7Video8.1
8.1Photo8.6
Why is Pro 2.0 better than QooCam 3 Ultra?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 2,280 mAh2.2×
- Max field of view360° vs 180°2×
Why is QooCam 3 Ultra better than Pro 2.0?
- Weight1,550 g vs 296 g5.2×
- Photo resolution60 MP vs 96 MP+60%
- Aperturef/2.4 vs f/1.6+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 1,550 g | 296 g |
| Width | — | 71.5 mm |
| Height | — | 103.2 mm |
| Depth | — | 26.6 mm |
| Waterproof without case | — | 10 m |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Min operating temperature | — | -20 °C |
| Max operating temperature | — | 40 °C |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 8K | 8K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| HDR video | Yes | Yes |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.59″ |
| Photo resolution | 60 MP | 96 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/1.6 |
| Max field of view | 360° | 180° |
| RAW photos | Yes | Yes |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | 6-Achsen Stabilisation |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | — | 3″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 2,280 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
