- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Pro 2.0 vs Pixpro 4KVR360
Insta360 Pro 2.0 vs Kodak Pixpro 4KVR360
What Pro 2.0 does better (4) and where Pixpro 4KVR360 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.7Video2.8
8.1Photo4.8
Why is Pro 2.0 better than Pixpro 4KVR360?
- 4K frame rate (max)120 fps vs 24 fps5×
- Max video resolution8K vs 4K
- Photo resolution60 MP vs 21 MP2.9×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 1,250 mAh4×
Why is Pixpro 4KVR360 better than Pro 2.0?
Pixpro 4KVR360 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 1,550 g | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 8K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 120 fps | 24 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| HDR video | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 60 MP | 21 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Max field of view | 360° | 360° |
| RAW photos | Yes | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 1,250 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| GPS | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
