- Clippertoday
- Compare
- X4 vs QooCam FUN
Insta360 X4 vs Kandao QooCam FUN
What X4 does better (5) and where QooCam FUN wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Video3.8
4.3Photo9.0
8.3Battery5.1
Why is X4 better than QooCam FUN?
- 4K frame rate (max)100 fps vs 30 fps3.3×
- Max video resolution8K vs 2.5K
- Max frame rate (slow motion)100 fps vs 30 fps3.3×
- Battery capacity2,290 mAh vs 920 mAh2.5×
- Battery life (recording)135 min vs 80 min+69%
Why is QooCam FUN better than X4?
- Weight203 g vs 70 g2.9×
- Sensor size (optical format)0.5″ vs 1″2×
- Max field of view170° vs 200°+18%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 203 g | 70 g |
| Width | 46 mm | — |
| Height | 123.6 mm | — |
| Depth | 37.6 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | 10 m | — |
| Min operating temperature | -20 °C | — |
| Max operating temperature | 40 °C | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 8K | 2.5K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 100 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 100 fps | 30 fps |
| HDR video | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Pre-recording (HindSight / Pre-Rec) | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.5″ | 1″ |
| Photo resolution | 18 MP | — |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Max field of view | 170° | 200° |
| Lenses | 2 | — |
| RAW photos | Yes | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 6-Achsen Stabilisation | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2.29″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Audio | ||
| Microphones | 4 | — |
| External microphone support | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,290 mAh | 920 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 135 min | 80 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Webcam mode | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
| Voice control | Yes | — |
