- Clippertoday
- Compare
- X350 vs X3.2
Kaiser Baas X350 vs Lamax X3.2
What X350 does better (3) and where X3.2 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X350X3.2
| X350 | X3.2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 40 mm | 44 mm | −4 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 60 mm | −1 mm |
| Depth | 30 mm | 33 mm | −3 mm |
| Weight | 80 g | 65 g | +15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X350 better than X3.2?
- Max video resolution4K vs 2.7K
- Photo resolution13 MP vs 12 MP+8%
- Depth30 mm vs 33 mm+10%
Why is X3.2 better than X350?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)30 fps vs 120 fps4×
- Weight80 g vs 65 g+23%
- Battery capacity1,050 mAh vs 1,200 mAh+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 80 g | 65 g |
| Width | 59 mm | 60 mm |
| Height | 40 mm | 44 mm |
| Depth | 30 mm | 33 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | — |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 2.7K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 30 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 13 MP | 12 MP |
| Max field of view | 160° | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | 1,200 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 135 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | — | 128 GB |
