- Clippertoday
- Compare
- QooCam 3 Ultra vs SL3 4K
Kandao QooCam 3 Ultra vs Patona SL3 4K
What QooCam 3 Ultra does better (6) and where SL3 4K wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.1Video7.3
8.6Photo4.3
7.7Ruggedness9.6
Why is QooCam 3 Ultra better than SL3 4K?
- Max video resolution8K vs 4K
- 4K frame rate (max)120 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Photo resolution96 MP vs 16 MP6×
- Battery capacity2,280 mAh vs 1,000 mAh2.3×
- Aperturef/1.6 vs f/2.8+75%
- Max field of view180° vs 140°+29%
Why is SL3 4K better than QooCam 3 Ultra?
- Waterproof without case10 m vs 30 m3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 296 g | — |
| Width | 71.5 mm | — |
| Height | 103.2 mm | — |
| Depth | 26.6 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | 10 m | 30 m |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Min operating temperature | -20 °C | — |
| Max operating temperature | 40 °C | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 8K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| HDR video | Yes | — |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.59″ | — |
| Photo resolution | 96 MP | 16 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/2.8 |
| Max field of view | 180° | 140° |
| RAW photos | Yes | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 6-Achsen Stabilisation | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 3″ | 3″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,280 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 90 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| GPS | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | — | Yes |
