LIVE240 modelsBrands 68Comparisons 865Oct 21, 2026RankingsAdvertise
clippertoday.com
  1. Clippertoday
  2. Compare
  3. 4K vs W10.2

Klack 4K vs Lamax W10.2

What 4K does better (0) and where W10.2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Klack 4K
Klack · 20264K
0 advantages
vs
Lamax W10.2
Lamax · 2025W10.2
9.4Score
2 advantages≈ $6,500
Higher score
7.3Video8.0

Why is 4K better than W10.2?

4K has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is W10.2 better than 4K?

  1. Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 240 fps2×
  2. Main screen size1.33″ vs 2″+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Lamax W10.2Lamax W10.2≈ $6,5009.4
Design & durability
Weight—127 g
Width—64 mm
Height—42 mm
Depth—32 mm
Waterproof without case—12 m
Waterproof with housing—40 m
Video
Max video resolution4K4K
4K frame rate (max)60 fps60 fps
Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps240 fps
H.265 / HEVC—Yes
Timelapse / hyperlapseYesYes
Stabilisation
Stabilisation systemElektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS)—
Electronic image stabilisationYes—
Screens
Front screen—Yes
Main screen size1.33″2″
Front screen size—1.4″
Touchscreen—Yes
Audio
External microphone supportYes—
Battery
Battery capacity—1,350 mAh
Battery life (recording)—120 min
Connectivity
Wi-FiYesYes
Live streamingYes—
Storage & features
microSD card slot—Yes
Max memory card—256 GB
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare