- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Vision P400 vs AT907
Krüger & Matz Vision P400 vs Pora&Co AT907
What Vision P400 does better (1) and where AT907 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
Why is Vision P400 better than AT907?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 30 fps2×
Why is AT907 better than Vision P400?
AT907 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Aperture | f/2 | f/2 |
| Max field of view | 170° | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | — | 2″ |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (recording) | 60 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | Yes | — |
