- Clippertoday
- Compare
- W10.1 vs W9.2
Lamax W10.1 vs Lamax W9.2
What W10.1 does better (2) and where W9.2 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
W10.1W9.2
| W10.1 | W9.2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 42 mm | 42 mm | = |
| Width | 64 mm | 64 mm | = |
| Depth | 32 mm | 32 mm | = |
| Weight | 127 g | 127 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is W10.1 better than W9.2?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 60 fps4×
- Photo resolution64 MP vs 20 MP3.2×
Why is W9.2 better than W10.1?
W9.2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 127 g | 127 g |
| Width | 64 mm | 64 mm |
| Height | 42 mm | 42 mm |
| Depth | 32 mm | 32 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 12 m | 12 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 60 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 64 MP | 20 MP |
| Max field of view | — | 120° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Front screen size | 1.4″ | 1.4″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,350 mAh | 1,350 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 120 min | 120 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | 256 GB | 128 GB |
