- Clippertoday
- Compare
- W9.2 vs X9.2
Lamax W9.2 vs Lamax X9.2
What W9.2 does better (5) and where X9.2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
W9.2X9.2
| W9.2 | X9.2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 42 mm | 44 mm | −2 mm |
| Width | 64 mm | 60 mm | +4 mm |
| Depth | 32 mm | 33 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 127 g | 65 g | +62 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is W9.2 better than X9.2?
- Waterproof without case12 m vs 0 m
- Battery capacity1,350 mAh vs 1,050 mAh+29%
- Photo resolution20 MP vs 16 MP+25%
- Front screen size1.4″ vs 1.3″+8%
- Depth32 mm vs 33 mm+3%
Why is X9.2 better than W9.2?
- Weight127 g vs 65 g+95%
- Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 240 fps4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 127 g | 65 g |
| Width | 64 mm | 60 mm |
| Height | 42 mm | 44 mm |
| Depth | 32 mm | 33 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 12 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 240 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 20 MP | 16 MP |
| Max field of view | 120° | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Front screen size | 1.4″ | 1.3″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,350 mAh | 1,050 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 120 min | 120 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | 128 GB | 128 GB |
