- Clippertoday
- Compare
- W9.2 vs AT-M82TR 6K
Lamax W9.2 vs Lipa AT-M82TR 6K
What W9.2 does better (4) and where AT-M82TR 6K wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.4Video8.9
5.8Photo9.8
8.9Ruggedness4.2
7.4Battery5.6
Why is W9.2 better than AT-M82TR 6K?
- Weight127 g vs 300 g2.4×
- Waterproof without case12 m vs 0 m
- Battery life (recording)120 min vs 90 min+33%
- Waterproof with housing40 m vs 30 m+33%
Why is AT-M82TR 6K better than W9.2?
- Max video resolution4K vs 6K
- Photo resolution20 MP vs 50 MP2.5×
- Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Max field of view120° vs 170°+42%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 127 g | 300 g |
| Width | 64 mm | — |
| Height | 42 mm | — |
| Depth | 32 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | 12 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 6K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 20 MP | 50 MP |
| Max field of view | 120° | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 2″ | — |
| Front screen size | 1.4″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,350 mAh | 1,350 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 120 min | 90 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | 128 GB | — |
