- Clippertoday
- Compare
- W9.2 vs D6Pro
Lamax W9.2 vs Rollei D6Pro
What W9.2 does better (2) and where D6Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
W9.2D6Pro
| W9.2 | D6Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 42 mm | 42 mm | = |
| Width | 64 mm | 63.3 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Depth | 32 mm | 30.8 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Weight | 127 g | 70 g | +57 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is W9.2 better than D6Pro?
- Waterproof without case12 m vs 5 m2.4×
- Photo resolution20 MP vs 5 MP4×
Why is D6Pro better than W9.2?
- Max video resolution4K vs 5K
- Weight127 g vs 70 g+81%
- Battery life (recording)120 min vs 150 min+25%
- Main screen size2″ vs 2.2″+10%
- Max field of view120° vs 170°+42%
- Depth32 mm vs 30.8 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 127 g | 70 g |
| Width | 64 mm | 63.3 mm |
| Height | 42 mm | 42 mm |
| Depth | 32 mm | 30.8 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 12 m | 5 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 5K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | — |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.44″ |
| Photo resolution | 20 MP | 5 MP |
| Max field of view | 120° | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2.2″ |
| Front screen size | 1.4″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,350 mAh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 120 min | 150 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | 128 GB | — |
