LIVE240 modelsBrands 68Comparisons 867Oct 21, 2026RankingsAdvertise
clippertoday.com
  1. Clippertoday
  2. Compare
  3. W9.2 vs SF630

Lamax W9.2 vs Surfola SF630

What W9.2 does better (2) and where SF630 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Lamax W9.2
Lamax · 2025W9.2
8.3Score
2 advantages≈ $180
Higher score
vs
Surfola SF630
Surfola · 2024SF630
8.0Score
1 advantage≈ $120
6.4Video6.4
8.9Ruggedness8.1
7.4Battery5.6
4.0Features4.0

Why is W9.2 better than SF630?

  1. Battery life (recording)120 min vs 90 min+33%
  2. Waterproof without case12 m vs 10 m+20%

Why is SF630 better than W9.2?

  1. Photo resolution20 MP vs 24 MP+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Lamax W9.2Lamax W9.2≈ $1808.3
Surfola SF630Surfola SF630≈ $1208.0
Design & durability
Weight127 g—
Width64 mm—
Height42 mm—
Depth32 mm—
Waterproof without case12 m10 m
Waterproof with housing40 m—
Video
Max video resolution4K4K
4K frame rate (max)60 fps60 fps
Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps60 fps
Timelapse / hyperlapseYesYes
Sensor & photo
Photo resolution20 MP24 MP
Max field of view120°—
Stabilisation
Stabilisation systemElektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS)6-Achsen Stabilisation
Electronic image stabilisationYesYes
Screens
Front screenYesYes
Main screen size2″2″
Front screen size1.4″—
TouchscreenYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity1,350 mAh1,350 mAh
Battery life (recording)120 min90 min
Connectivity
Wi-FiYesYes
Storage & features
microSD card slotYesYes
Max memory card128 GB—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare