- Clippertoday
- Compare
- W9.2 vs GO 2600
Lamax W9.2 vs Trevi GO 2600
What W9.2 does better (1) and where GO 2600 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is W9.2 better than GO 2600?
- 4K frame rate (max)60 fps vs 30 fps2×
Why is GO 2600 better than W9.2?
- Waterproof without case12 m vs 21 m+75%
- Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Max field of view120° vs 140°+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 127 g | — |
| Width | 64 mm | — |
| Height | 42 mm | — |
| Depth | 32 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | 12 m | 21 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 20 MP | 20 MP |
| Max field of view | 120° | 140° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Front screen size | 1.4″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,350 mAh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 120 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
| Max memory card | 128 GB | — |
